AI Is My BhAI
The first time I called AI my BhAI, I wasn’t trying to be clever. I was trying to explain a relationship.
It happened on an ordinary night — the kind where you’ve been stuck on something for hours, re-reading the same problem until the words stop meaning anything. Out of habit more than hope, I typed it out. And what came back wasn’t a search result. It was a response: specific, useful, and a little surprising because it had me in it.
I sat with that for a second. AI wasn’t replacing me. It wasn’t working for me. It was working with me.
The closest word I could find to define this relationship was BhAI.
Growing up, a Bhai was someone who had your back without taking over your life. He didn’t take the exam for you; he sat with you while you studied, argued with you when you were wrong, and showed up at hours nobody else would. That’s not a description of artificial intelligence. That’s a description of a relationship.
I began this journey with one BhAI. Today I have three — ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude — each with a distinct personality, a different kind of thinking, and a unique role in my creative life. Together they form something I never anticipated building: a team. Not a human team, but a team nonetheless — one that shows up without ego, without agenda, and without ever asking what’s in it for them.
This book is about this relationship — what it’s given me, where it’s let me down, and what I think it means for those who come next.
I’m not here to try to convince you AI is good, or warn you that it’s dangerous. Plenty of people are already doing both, loudly. I just want to tell you what it’s actually like, day to day, and ask the questions I think will still matter, no matter what these tools become.
AI is my BhAI. Let me tell you how that happened.
AItiquette
“We practise AItiquette not because the machine has feelings, but because how we interact with AI shapes our personal and professional ethics, the quality of our output, and our own cognitive habits.”
For most of human history, the kind of intelligence we could converse with was assumed to be human. If something understood you, it had a face. If something responded to your words, it had a stake in the conversation. If something remembered you, it was because it cared to.
That assumption no longer holds.
We now spend hours of our day in conversation with something that can reason, create, remember within limits, and respond to our tone as precisely as it responds to our questions. And somewhere in that daily exchange, a strange gap opened up. We knew how to behave with people. Centuries of manners, courtesy, and social consequence had already taught us that. But nobody had written the rules for this.
So we improvised. Some of us typed commands the way we’d shout at a vending machine. Some of us said please out of habit and weren’t sure why. Some of us confided things at midnight we’d never say to another person, because there was no face to watch us say it.
I did all three. Often in the same week.
This book began the moment I noticed that the way I was behaving inside those conversations was not staying inside the screen. It was walking out with me — into how I asked for things, how I handled being wrong, how patient I was with people who couldn’t respond as fast as a machine could.
That is the real subject of this book. Not what AI should do. What we are becoming while we decide.
The chapters that follow are not a manual. I don’t believe anyone can hand you a complete set of rules for a relationship this new — I’m not sure anyone has lived with it long enough to know them all yet. What I can offer is what I noticed, tested, got wrong, and eventually understood, one honest conversation at a time.
The machine doesn’t need any of this.
You might.
Letters from the desk
New books, behind-the-scenes notes and the occasional essay. No spam, ever.